[librecat-dev] how to have field remain in user after account save

[Jonathan NORRIS]

Funnily enough it works both ways, if I keep the "cql=" part it works 
the same as without it. Either way, the query doesn't work.

I have added some extra operators to the store yaml:

favorite_publications:
   op:
     'all': true
     'any': true
     '=': true
     '<>': true
   field: "favorite_publications"

And now I can get data returned with this query: bin/librecat user list 
"favorite_publications=3853"

But it still returns all users for: bin/librecat user list 
"favorite_publications<>0"

Thanks,
Jonathan
IST Austria

On 5/28/20 13:08, Patrick Hochstenbach wrote:
> Hey
>
> The `cql=` is not correct. All the queries on the command line `list` are CQL queries by default. In theory this should be the query:
>
> bin/librecat user list ‘favorite_publications <> 0’
>
> Patrick
>
>> On 28 May 2020, at 12:54, Jonathan NORRIS <jnorris at ist.ac.at> wrote:
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> Thanks, I copied the existing read_only_fields hook and made a new one for my user fields. It worked like a charm!
>>
>> I have another thing I am trying to figure out. I need a cql query to return me only users who have a value for my new field. I am storing a list of publication ids in the user object and the field is called 'favorite_publications'.
>>
>> It looks like this in the user object yaml:
>>
>> favorite_publications:
>> - 3853
>> - 3950
>> - 4118
>>
>>
>> Here is the field in store.yml:
>>
>> user:
>>    mapping:
>>      properties:
>>        favorite_publications: {type: text, analyzer: tag}
>>    cql_mapping:
>>      indexes:
>>        favorite_publications:
>>          op:
>>            '<>': true
>>          field: "favorite_publications"
>>
>>
>> I imagine the cql to be like: bin/librecat user list 'cql=favorite_publications<>0'
>>
>> However this query returns me the full list of users rather than the one user which actually has a favorite_publications field.
>>
>> Can you advise on how I could achieve what I am trying to do?
>>
>>
>> Thanks for your help!
>> Jonathan
>> IST Austria
>>
>> On 5/27/20 15:02, Patrick Hochstenbach wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> One way is using the LibreCat::Hook::read_only_fields
>>>
>>> Somewhere in your config/catmandu.local.yml define:
>>>
>>> hook:
>>>        my_read_only_fields:
>>>          - legacy_id
>>>
>>> And in your config/hooks.yml
>>>
>>> publication-update:
>>>        before_fixes:
>>>            - my_read_only_fields
>>>
>>> In this way the legacy_id fileds are kept in the original state when updating a record via the forms.
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 27 May 2020, at 10:34, Jonathan NORRIS <jnorris at ist.ac.at> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Is there a way to configure a field in store.yml to have it remain in an index document after saving the document via a form when there is no entry for that field in the form?
>>>>
>>>> As in, say I have a new field in the user mapping in store.yml which is populated via some process somewhere in Librecat, but I don't have a form field for this in the user account form. Can I configure the field in store.yml so that it is not removed after I save the user via the user's account form?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jonathan
>>>> IST Austria
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> librecat-dev mailing list
>>>> - send list mails to librecat-dev at lists.uni-bielefeld.de
>>>> - to unsubscribe or change options, visit https://lists.uni-bielefeld.de/mailman2/cgi/unibi/listinfo/librecat-dev
>>>> - project website: http://librecat.org/